Senate FY16 LHHS Post Mark-Up Summary

Last week, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Senate Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education (LHHS) Appropriation bill was approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee along a party line vote of 16-14. This legislation proposes $32 billion for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) an increase of $2 billion over FY15 and $415.1 million  for the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) which is $17.4 million over the enacted FY15 level of $397.7 million.  Some of the increases for NIH were provided for the following initiatives:

  • $200 million for Precision Medicine;
  • $350 million increase for the National Institute on Aging, the lead Institute researching Alzheimer’s disease;
  • $135 million, an increase of $70 million, for the BRAIN Initiative to map the human brain;
  • $461 million, an increase of $100 million, to Combat Antibiotic Resistance;
  • $300 million, an increase of $26.7 million, for the Institutional Development Award;
  • And increases to every Institute and Center to continue investments in innovative research that will advance fundamental knowledge and speed the development of new therapies, diagnostics, and preventive measures to improve the health of all Americans.

The Committee report also included report language pertinent to NIDCR. Specifically:

 “Temporomandibular Disorders {TMD }.-Temporomandibular Disorders affect approximately 35 million Americans; the majority affected are women in their childbearing years. The Committee encourages NIBIB, NIAMS, and NIDCR to consider the recommendations that resulted from their jointly sponsored Roundtable on the Temporomandibular Joint in Health and Disease in 2013. Research to develop safe and effective techniques for joint repair and regeneration is essential. An analysis of problems associated with current joint replacements should provide guidance in these efforts. The Committee commends NIDCR for its ongoing support for the OPPERA program, which is yielding valuable information on many physiological aspects, not only of temporomandibular disorders, but of other pain conditions that overlap with TMD. To capitalize on the research to continue the momentum gained from OPPERA, the Committee urges NIH to continue research of this caliber and direction, and to consider measures to encourage NIH-funded investigators from related fields to include TMD and comorbid conditions in their studies.”

However, since the overall allocation for this bill is $3.6 billion below the FY15 enacted level, the proposed increased funding came at the expense of other important public health programs. Funding for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was cut by 35% and the National Center for Health Statistics received a $10 million reduction.

During the committee mark-up Ranking Member Mikulski (D-MD) and Senators Collins (R-ME) and Shelby (R-AL) voiced their support of the $2 billion increase for NIH, including the $300 million budgeted specifically for Alzheimer’s research.  During the committee mark-up Senator Durbin (D-IL) strongly supported NIH research and said, “There should be a standard in which the NIH would have a 5% increase in the budget every year. This would then help to break a long run of mediocre investments and sequestration.”

Senator Cassidy (R-LA) also proposed an amendment which would take $235 million away from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and reallocate those funds to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute for Mental Health and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Senator Cassidy argued that, “The NIH spending priorities are no longer on the current main health issues that Americans are facing today.” He mentioned that AIDS research received 10% of the NIH’s funding for the past 25 years and other diseases and conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s, and ALS warrant our attention. This amendment failed by a 6-23 vote.

Senator Murray (D-WA) voted against approval of the appropriations bill noting that she would like the sequestration caps lifted so that more money is available to fund other important programs.

Below is additional information about programs of importance to AADR:

  • HRSA Title VII Training in Oral Health Care received $32 million  which is a slight decrease from the FY15 level of $33.9 million The Committee provides $32,000,000 for Training in Oral Health Care programs, which includes not less than $9,000,000 each for general and pediatric dentistry. Funds may be used to expand training in general dentistry, pediatric dentistry, public health dentistry, dental hygiene, and other oral health access programs. Funds may also be used to plan and operate training programs, as well as to provide financial assistance to students and residents. The Committee directs HRSA to prioritize programs that support underserved communities and applicants from disadvantaged background in any new grant competition. Further, the Committee encourages HRSA to focus on training programs that target vulnerable populations in risk-based clinical disease management of all populations. The Committee urges HRSA to work with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS] on the evaluation and support of additional models for expanding access to oral healthcare. Such models should include emergency room diversion programs and efforts under State law to deploy and evaluate new provider types.  The Committee continues long-standing bill language that prohibits funding for section 340G-1 of the PHS Act.
  • HRSA Maternal and Child Health Bureau Prenatal Oral Health.-The Committee recognizes the importance of prenatal oral healthcare for the health of both mother and child and encourages the MCH Bureau within HRSA to continue its efforts to improve the oral health of pregnant women. on these activities in the fiscal year 2017 CJ.
  • CDC Division of Oral Health received $15.7 million which is level with FY15. The Committee urges CDC to support clinical and public health interventions that target pregnant women and young children at highest risk for dental caries. These interventions result in significant cost-savings to State Medicaid programs. CDC is encouraged to continue to work across the Department to improve coordination of oral health surveillance that reliably measures and reports health outcomes.

AADR will continue to work with Congress to lift the caps on discretionary spending so all research and public health programs received increased, sustained and predictable funding.

AADR Voices Opposition to FASTR Act (S. 779)

This week the International and American Associations for Dental Research sent a letter to members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voicing our opposition to the Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (S. 779).  As a result of our efforts and those of the broader scientific advocacy community, the Senate Committee pulled the bill from the mark-up schedule. Committee staff agreed to meet with advocates to learn more about our concerns with the bill.

This legislation proposed to require Federal research agencies with research expenditures over $100 million to develop a policy for free online public access to peer reviewed manuscripts no later than six months after publication in peer reviewed journals. The current embargo period established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is 12 months and a reduction of the embargo period would have a detrimental effect on many biomedical research publications. As co-owners of the Journal of Dental Research, the association invests significant resources in the peer-review process, manuscript copyediting and layout and since 2002 in publishing the JDR online. Moreover, the scientific community relies on the publishers to manage the post-grant peer review process to evaluate the merit and authenticity of the conclusions of the research. Unlike the federal funding provided during the pre-grant peer review process, post-grant peer review is not funded by the agencies at all. The only way for the Associations to cover these significant costs is to retain the copyrighted materials and to offer individual and institutional subscriptions.

What’s Next? IADR and AADR will continue to partner with coalitions to help develop legislative language for the Senate Committee’s consideration. We are extremely grateful that Congress is willing to listen to the concerns of the community and will keep our members informed as this process moves forward.


SCOTUS Upholds ACA Subsidies in King v. Burwell Decision

By Johanna Gray, Vice President CRD Associates

Yesterday, the Supreme Court released its decision in King v. Burwell, the latest case challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  At issue was whether subsidies can be extended to low-income people who live in the 34 states that have federally-facilitated rather than state-based marketplaces.  The plaintiffs argued that Congress wrote the ACA in a way that only people who live in states with state-based marketplaces should receive subsidies, which would have jeopardized assistance for more than 6 million Americans currently receiving subsidies.  In a 6-3 ruling drafted by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court upheld the subsidies and kept the ACA intact.  People who live in states using for their marketplace can continue to receive subsidies.

Besides answering the immediate question about subsidies, the decision more broadly defends the current implementation of the ACA and will make it more difficult for other cases to successfully challenge the law.  This is because the decision says that ambiguous aspects of the ACA must be interpreted through the lens of Congress’ intent for the ACA to improve the health insurance market.  The decision even makes it more difficult for future administrations to remove subsidies from these states.  The decision concludes with this remarkable statement: “Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them. If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter.”

Policymakers in Washington and state houses across the country have been drafting various contingency plans anticipating that subsidies may be struck down.  Many plans would have traded extended subsidies for other reforms to the ACA, such as elimination of the individual mandate or other insurance policies.  While Congress is likely to continue to consider bills to repeal part or all of the ACA and state policymakers will continue to influence ACA implementation in their states, this decision means that the ACA is likely to continue as-is for the near future.


House Appropriations Cmte Approves Funding Bill for Health Agencies

Yesterday, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 House Labor, Health and Human services, and Education (LHHS) was brought to the full Appropriations Committee and was approved along a 30-21 party line vote. Interestingly, this was the first time in 3 years the bill has been reported out of subcommittee and 6 years since the bill was brought before the full committee for mark-up. Sub-committee Chairman Cole (R-OK) was overall very pleased with the bill and noted that while the overall allocation was $3.7 billion below FY15 the bill exceeds the President’s Budget request in several areas. Specifically, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) received an increase of $1.1 billion dollars from FY15 and a $100 million dollar increase from the President’s Budget Request and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) received an increase of $7.1 million increase from the FY15 enacted level of $397.7 million and $1.9 million below the President’s Budget Request.

During the mark-up, Ranking Member DeLauro (D-CT) proposed an amendment which would provide an even larger increase in the budget for NIH spending. She stated currently only 1 in 6 grant proposals are able to be funded as opposed to 1 in 3 a few years back. Rep. DeLauro tried to resonate with the committee the vast importance of the NIH and its continued research. Unfortunately, this amendment did not pass, but the importance of NIH funding was agreed upon by both sides of the aisle.

As previously reported, this bill terminates funding for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Funding (AHRQ). Rep. Roybal-Allard offered an amendment to restore funding for AHRQ, but this amendment was voted down along a party line vote. Chairman Cole noted that he would have to vote against the amendment because it would increase spending in the bill. However, the opened the window to potential negotiations with the Senate to reinstate the agency. According to CQ Healthbeat, “Cole signaled that the final version of the spending bill funding the Department of Health and Human Services for fiscal 2016 might not kill AHRQ funding, which Republicans have sought for a year. The measure will be the product of negotiations with Democrats in the White House and Senate appropriators.”

If adopted several programs received an increase in funding. Below is additional information about other oral health programs included in the legislation:

  • Oral Health Training Programs received $34,998,000 for Training in Oral Health Care programs, which is $1,070,000 more than the FY15 enacted level and the budget request. Within the funds provided, the Committee intends no less than $10,000,000 for General Dentistry Programs and no less than $10,000,000 for Pediatric Dentistry programs.
  • The Maternal and Child Health Block Grant received $5 million for dental health projects. This will help to support early childhood oral health interventions and prevention programs encompassing the medical/dental interface, topical fluorides, school and community-based sealant programs, and systems working in collaboration with the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and Head Start programs.
  • The Center for Disease Control (CDC) received $20 million for oral health, which enables support for State and community programs, surveillance, prevention research, evaluation, and health promotion. In addition, the National Center for Health Statistics received a $5 million dollar increase from FY15 and matched the president’s budget request.

    Finally, please click here to view a funding chart which details AADR’s other funding priorities included in the legislation.

House Proposes Increased funding for NIH, NIDCR and Termination of AHRQ

This week the House Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations Subcommittee voted to move its version of the fiscal year (FY) 16 LHHS appropriations bill forward to the full Appropriations Committee. According to the summary and accompany bill text released by the subcommittee this legislation proposes the following:

  • $31.2 billion for the National Institutes of Health, a $1.1 billion increase from FY15 and $100 million increase from the President’s Budget Request. According to the summary provided by the subcommittee: “The increases for several targeted research initiatives including $886 million a $300 million increase for Alzheimer’s diseases research initiative; $461 million a $100 million increase for an antibiotic resistance initiative; $150 million a $95 million increase for the BRAIN initiative for the full $200 million requested for the Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI).”
  • $404.8 million for the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), a $7.1 million increase from the FY15 enacted level of $397.7 million and $1.9 million below the President’s Budget request of $406.7 million.
  • The termination of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
  • A prohibition would be placed on the use of appropriated funding for patient-centered outcomes research.
  • None of the funds may be used for the release or implementation of the eighth edition of the dietary guidelines. The scientific evidence used must be rated strong for each of the revisions to the dietary guidelines.
  • Defunds many provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

The House LHHS bill also proposes to reallocate funding within the NIH Institutes and Centers. Some institutes and centers received a proposed cuts of 9-6% whereas others received large increases. According to Research!America, “These shifts can have a major impact on the pace and direction of medical progress.”

Today, AADR submitted a letter to the subcommittee expressing our gratitude for the increased funding for NIH and NIDCR and also our opposition to the elimination of AHRQ. We strongly urged the committee to end sequestration so that NIH and other public health programs can have stable, predictable and increased funding.

What’s Next? Additional details about other programs including HRSA Title VII, CDC Division of Oral Health and the National Center for Health Statistics, will be forthcoming with the full Appropriations Committee scheduled to consider the bill next week. We will provide further analysis about these areas after the committee report is released.

AADR Opposes Amendment in Defense Authorization Bill

This week, AADR joined the broader research community in a letter expressing our opposition to an amendment that would prohibit funding for medical research at the Department of Defense unless that research met certain narrowly-defined criteria related to military relevance. Given that approximately $6 million is provided annually through the Department of Defense Appropriations bill to support military dental research, AADR was concerned this amendment would harm this vitally important program.

As a result of the community’s advocacy efforts, the Senate agreed to not hold a vote on this amendment. This is considered a huge victory for the medical research community! AADR will continue to partner with the American Dental Association urging Congress to protect and provide funding for military dental research.

AADR Responds to OSTP RFI on the Microbiome

Today, AADR submitted comments to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) request for information (RFI) which solicited feedback from industry, academia, research laboratories, and other stakeholder groups on both the overarching questions that unite all microbiome research and the tools, technologies, and training needed to advance the field of research. In 2008 the oral cavity was designated as one of five priority sites in the NIH Human Microbiome Project and the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research supports the Human Oral Microbiome database. This database is a community resource providing comprehensive information on over 700 different microbial species present in the oral cavity. The information provided in AADR’s response to this RFI was based on the input from scientists working in this field of oral microbiome research.

The Coalition for Health Funding Celebrates 45 Year Anniversary

This week, AADR was proud to co-sponsor the Coalition for Health Funding 45th Anniversary Reception on Capitol Hill.  Established in 1970 the Coalition for Health Funding is the oldest and largest nonprofit alliance working to preserve and strengthen public health investments in the best interest of all Americans. With over 95 member organizations the Coalition represents more than 100 million patients, health care providers, public health professionals and scientist. Carolyn Mullen, AADR director of government affairs, is a member of the Coalition for Health Funding Board of Directors.

During the reception Representatives Gene Green (D-TX)  and David Jolly (R-FL) stressed the importance of public health. A poster created by AADR was on display so members of Congress and their staff could learn how research investments saved millions of Americans from dental diseases.CHF anniversary photo

AADR looks forward to working with the Coalition in the upcoming weeks and months as they lead the effort to educate Congress about the harmful effects of austerity measures and urge policymakers to end sequestration permanently.

Click here for additional information about the Coalition for Health Funding.

House Approves Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Bill

Last week, the US House of Representatives approved the fiscal year 2016 Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations (H.R. 2578) bill by a 248-183 vote. As previously reported, the CJS bill proposes funding allocations for the Department of Commerce, the Department of Justice, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and other related agencies. For NSF specifically, the House allocated approximately  $7.4 billion, an increase of $50 million above the fiscal year 2015 enacted level and a $329 million decrease from the President’s request of $7.7 billion.


Due to the fact that this legislation proposes funding at the reduced sequestration levels the White House issued a statement of administration policy  threatening to veto this legislation. Specifically, the White House states, “Enacting H.R. 2578 and adhering to the congressional Republican budget’s overall spending limits for fiscal year (FY) 2016 would hurt our economy and shortchange investments in middle- class priorities. Sequestration was never intended to take effect: rather, it was supposed to threaten such drastic cuts to both defense and non-defense funding that policymakers would be motivated to come to the table and reduce the deficit through smart, balanced reforms. The Republican framework would bring base discretionary funding for both non-defense and defense for FY 2016 to the lowest real levels in a decade.”


AADR will continue to work with NDD United and the Coalition for Health Funding urging Congress to undo sequestration permanently and find a long term solution to the debt and deficit that does not rely on cuts to discretionary funding.